RocketEngines: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
!XCOR | !XCOR | ||
!XCOR | !XCOR | ||
|Armadillo | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Model''' | |'''Model''' | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
|[http://www.xcor.com/products/engines/4A3_LOX_alcohol_rocket_engine.html XR-4A3 (EZ-rocket)] | |[http://www.xcor.com/products/engines/4A3_LOX_alcohol_rocket_engine.html XR-4A3 (EZ-rocket)] | ||
|[http://www.xcor.com/products/engines/5K18_LOX-kerosene_rocket_engine.html XR-5K18 (Lynx)] | |[http://www.xcor.com/products/engines/5K18_LOX-kerosene_rocket_engine.html XR-5K18 (Lynx)] | ||
|[http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=366 LOX/methane (no name)] | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Propellers''' | |'''Propellers''' | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
|LOX & Alcohol | |LOX & Alcohol | ||
|LOX & Kerosene | |LOX & Kerosene | ||
|LOX & LCH4 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Tank pressurization''' | |'''Tank pressurization''' | ||
| Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
|No | |No | ||
|No | |No | ||
|Yes, with Helium | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Fuel pump''' | |'''Fuel pump''' | ||
| Line 32: | Line 36: | ||
|Piston pump | |Piston pump | ||
|Piston pump | |Piston pump | ||
|No | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Cooling''' | |'''Cooling''' | ||
| Line 37: | Line 42: | ||
|Regenerative (w/ Alcohol?) | |Regenerative (w/ Alcohol?) | ||
|Regenerative w/ Kerosene | |Regenerative w/ Kerosene | ||
|? | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Chamber metal''' | |'''Chamber metal''' | ||
| Line 42: | Line 48: | ||
|Copper | |Copper | ||
|Copper | |Copper | ||
|? | |||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 15:16, 3 August 2010
Rocket Engine
The general principle may be simple, but there are numerous ways of achieving it. Different features and properties differ between existing rocket engines, and they all have consequences on complexity of manufacturing, complexity of operation, cost and weight for example.
We gather in this table the main properties of existing rocket engines.
| Company | Rocketdyne | XCOR | XCOR | Armadillo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | SSME | XR-4A3 (EZ-rocket) | XR-5K18 (Lynx) | LOX/methane (no name) |
| Propellers | LOX & LH2 | LOX & Alcohol | LOX & Kerosene | LOX & LCH4 |
| Tank pressurization | Yes, with O2 and H2 gases | No | No | Yes, with Helium |
| Fuel pump | Turbopump | Piston pump | Piston pump | No |
| Cooling | Regenerative w/ LH2 in three stages | Regenerative (w/ Alcohol?) | Regenerative w/ Kerosene | ? |
| Chamber metal | Copper or iron? | Copper | Copper | ? |
Pumps and tank pressurization
In order to get fuel from the tanks into the combustion chamber, the tanks must be either pressurized or the fuels pumped. In some cases, both techniques are used. The choice for this concern has a large impact on the design of the engine's hardware, and the complexity of manufacturing and operations.
Traditionnaly, only turbo pumps have been able to feed the engine at a large enough rate. Innovative solutions appeared in research projects or private space projects, like the use of piston pumps for LOX or simple pressurization using liquid helium.
Several possibilities exist for tank pressurization:
- vaporization of liquid propellants back into their own tanks
- external vaporization of inert gas like Helium (can Nitrogen be used for that?)
- smoke generator, that basically react fuel and oxidizer and use the resulting smoke for pressurization.
Cooling
Regenerative cooling is most widely used in rocket engines.
Few of them however use other ways, like ablatively cooling carbon fiber composite in SpaceX Merlin 1A engine, or radiative cooling in the Merlin Vacuum nozzle (still regenerative for the chamber).
